Death in Police custody

Death in Police custody

Justice want by raji Tribal lady victim FIR No. 99/2007 Section 299-91  Joljibi Police arrested Manohar Singh Alias Man Singh 10 July 2007 He did not came back home since then former MLA and other local social worker take movement against police. Police did not give any answer. Police became forced to file FIR No. 100/2007 Section 343 and 384 on self and informed to chief minister and administration. Formar chief minister B.C Khanduri was on visit at Baram due to natural disaster Matter become highlighted in Media. After some time MLA and social worker gave away the company of victim lady. she was force to live silently you cannot win over police there were two account open in jila sarkari bank ascot in the name of victim lady. She was forced to not attend court. if former MLA Mr. Gagan singh rajwar  take interest in support of victim lady. Then the victim lady find justice in 2007. But they openly safe police. Every thing is exposed under RTI.

I complained to the Governor in above case in 2009. due to the order of governor a care was file no 2/2010 in state police complained authority Dehradun victim lady and her family member police force the victim lady not to attend state police complained authority police presented the false affidavit and finger print on his own behalf in the absence of victim lady It was proofed by formal high court judge and formal chairman state police complaints authority Dehradun Mr. J.C.S Rawat He registered the statement of victim lady in the pressure of circuit bench He proved that police is presenting false affidavit I want justice in case  of death of my husband in the custody of police. My husband did not came back home since police take him . nobody take gaurenter of my husband  in police station police was wrong. It is more dangerous than ranveer encounter every one silent become victim lady have not vote or note police will take hearing at police authority Dehradun which will be historical backward Raji Tribal will feel the power of law and order of uttarakhand government is really want justice for Raji Tribal They should go for enquiry through CBI. Police  is giving me forcefully afraid time to time I will not back home till the Raji Tribal will get justice.

Mr. J.C.S Rawat completes the report sheet for Raji Tribal. He mentions that Raji Tribal is decreasing species. State legal service authority and Uttarakhand Govt. suggest the legal aid to victim lady and conservation to Raji Tribal. They are very simple and behave friendly with them.

Thanking you,     

Jaswant Singh Jangpangi

Email: jaswantsingh19957@yahoo.com

Mob. 9759284091

Holy & Beautiful

Uttarakhand is my mother land

But Every one…………….

                          Heartless, Senstiveless And Selfish Moralless Godland Uttarakhand India, Kindly – Feel Poor Person Of Schedule Cast  And Schedule Tribes (Nomad)Pain

It seems that no human right worker and social worker

If someone will do effectively free from life imprisonment to schedule tribes(nomad) minors like Johar Singh Parihar. (One man army struggle in uttarakhand since 1990 without violence and any type of support for very poor illiterate living in bad condition of uttarakhand and powerless of schedules cast and tribes of remote areas .I am also prisionpayee for six month in Historical jail  Almora Uttarakhand innocent so that no appeal called for Right to information act 2005 Government of india Declared Punished un judicially and power misused. 

RTI-Activist

http:human corruption blog sopt.com

My struggling life as one man army

Jaswant singh Jung pangi

Tehsil & ward – Didihat

Distt – Pithoragarh, U.K

Email- J.Jangpangi@gmail.com

Mob No. 9759284091

To,

Your Excellency Governor

Uttarakhand, Dehradun

Subject:- Uttarakhand lok Ayukta became culprit for Schedule Cast  And Schedule Tribes.

Sir,

1.       Complaint No. 351/2004 Jaswant Singh Jangpangi vs. Sudha Joshi Lokayukta Dehradun

2.       Kaushalya Devi vs Nagar Panchyet, Didihat Distt Pithoragarh  Lokayukta Dehradun

3.       Case No. 681/2012 kailash singh vs nagar panahayat&administration Lokayukta Dehradun

In all above cases, honorable lokyukta uttarakhand because culprit to sc & st. all above cases, Information from RTI & other profit loudly says that there is an open his behave with SC&ST.

1.    For only Rs. 5000 a sc women, Jayanti devi wife of late Nathu Ram nai basti, Didihat distt pitoragarh UK who was working as maid resulting auction her home, punishment for her husband and there after death in 1999. Her husband was only a guarantor in court not hard core criminal

2.     The guarantor Dhani Ram, deposited 5000/- in court and ordered free from court resulting no punishment. He is posted in BSF now.

3.    Smt Jayanti devi also have Rs 5000 fix deposit in bank and receipt was kept with Sudha devi to safety purpose.

The police bank and social worker alone tax payee, as BJP leader and owner of big pharmacy shop of distt. Ward member nagar pandayat didihat distt pithoragarh froad this receipt against jayanti devi was working as a maid since long time in sudha devi’s home.

Your Excellency governor sir, a very much serving species of human in India, still today living in very wild condition, the of Raji tribes and inhuman behavior with them, I success in  published this news in media allies long live struggle. Minor child from them whose age was 12 & 14 years, are in dist jail Haridwar for life imprisonment. All judicial prospects was fail in this case became of his back support with them since 2005 no visitor was approach to them also because of no good judicial support, they could not find children right & justice they were innocent and minor. The chairmen, Child right commission UK Govt. Mr. Ajay Setia also mention his event in their annual report of 2013 this report is also send to state legal service authority and chief secretary. In 2010 Governor of Uttarakhand ordered to examine this court to tahsildar Didihat, mr. laxman singh pingal, and in their verification, the two child was found minors in 2010 national legal service authority honorable supreme court supported me, and accosting to family regarding in which their dob was 1990 & 1992 I & appeal in high court UK Nainital the judge ignored my appeal in very rudely senseless heartless and non justice Mr. governor, country law fallow the unite for all your gave mercy to mr. jawahar singh parihar, a wealthy person and soft stone professional who has many of criminal cases in police record and half of his punishment spended on parol. They have strong political back that spend his punishment since 2005. You released  him.

The same condition release the two minor child also who are very poor no political back, no support with them and they still look minor today. Their present condition is very poor their condition is same as with & female dear in forest whose kid was took by wild lion. They can not do anymore and looks

from only their kids in crying condition and surgery . Raji Tribal have not any criminal history still today.

Law, police and civilized society are the same as that dangerous wild lion for the backwards Raji tribe in this so called modern period.

Another Raji tribe community person was not back home from Joljibi police custody since 10 July 2007 which has FIR no 99/007 section 290-91. In this case police registered FIR case no 100/007 under section 343/384.against own self Joljibi Police. There after they put the final report of above case and declare the man sen disaster. Then after case was end due to conspiracy. I complain this case to Mr. Governor Uttarakhand in 2009. The police conspiracies to that lady and misbehaved with them and due to money support from social workers victim wife is not able to go to complaint authority and court and exposed the above conditions by former judge of high court and chairman, police complaint authority Mr. J.C.S. Rawat. He went to the remote area with circuit branch and recorded the feeling full statement of victim lady. Victim lady needed action against with police because her husband could not back home from police custody since 10 July 2007. Rest of the exposure I do with the help of RTI act 2005 Govt of India. Above case police complaint authority this is the 2 December 2014. Police open an account of victim lady with 1 lakh rupee in Jila sahkari bank Askot Pithoragarh. Mr. Rawat also made report on their very poor condition according to 2000 senses. Raji tribes have their own population to the came to minimum level of 517 and Raji tribes totally cut from civilized society. They are very simple peoples. They aware polices to behave friendly and advice to Govt of Uttarakhand to give conserve them and requested state legal service authoring to give legal aid to victim lady but legal service authority could not take any action till now. I came to Dehradoon every month for social service and rights for many people. I am not linked to any NGO and any political party. I am alone struggle as  one man army without violent approach. I am still struggling without Burdon and foultry. I have lot of evidence for above social justice and right under RTI but I have no money power of political support because  our countrys justice by money, every one is not salman khan, jailalita, jawahar singh parihar, Lalu yadav and pappu Yadav. RTI is       X ray not operation.

If the money came in time, the poor SC victim lady will not be the widow. According to the bank rule, Bank FD can be broken any time. On demanding of bank receipt, On 26 Aug 1999, family member of Sudha Joshi beated cruelly to SC Lady and her husband Late Nathuram on road in front of SC Cast dominated Nai Basti. They were insulted with caste mentioned words.

In absence of bank receipt, the Bank Manager of Jila Sahkari Bank Didihat insulted to the lady and kick her out of Bank and said that her no money now, all the money have been withdraw by you.

Case went to police station Didihat but no action was taken there. At last case was put in front of DSP P.S Sanga, Police headquarter Dist Pithoragarh. He gave insured to the lady by taking figure print but still not action was taken in BJP ruled under political pressure.

All the situation of lack of money, auction of home, punishment to her husband and finally death was published in daily Amar Ujala by Reporter Manmohan singh mehra.

I, according to my fundamental duty to guide the SC lady, but that family try to destroy us (both me and Press Reporter) by money power and use of the lackance of judicial system. Still struggling for poor caste lady and justice since 1999.

Due to my struggle for the justice the bank, police and Sudha Joshi for the sake of their prestige, they called the SC lady in the Bank and paid the lady more than Rs.10000/- by putting affidavit in year 2001. The receipt still not came out due to illegal withdraw of money both by bank & Sudha Joshi before 1999. If this money was given to the SC lady by caring of good behavior of bank and police then that SC lady will not be widow today in teen age.

Due to guide of SC lady, a fake case was registered in Police station Didihat, that case no 28/2000 section 323,504,506 state Vs Jaswant singh. Junior division magistrate Didihat declared me innocent. Then after they appealed dist Judge and

High court also declared me innocent. Thanks God to honorable Supreme Court of India who was not accepts their revision. Also I filed case against them case no 29/ section sc/st act 323,504,506.Girish Joshi s/o sudha joshi and others.Police station Didihat under political pressure. Police DSP P.S. sanga regects  there case of sc/st act which mean highly criminal after that junior division court take his case in knowledge (then after they state stay in this case in honorable high court. Nainital high dismissed the case silently and not informed to the victims)

Although honorable supreme court declared clear by in their decisions. This is not law but high court has no power to dismiss any criminal case. (Chatting in high court)

Case no.351 Jaswant singh v/s sudha a complaint was registered in lokayukta in 2004 and tried to proof innocent sudha joshi. I also alligate DSP P.S Sanga SHO B.B.Yadav police station Didihat, bank manager R.K. bansal and sudha joshi and victim smt Jayanti Devi.

Investigation officer Mr. Devendra Singh Negi understood no need to alligants the above statement. the complete investigation with investigation the above. Although the statement of above is compulsory for transparency of justices the investigation was labelled to take statements other  in place of above.

Although the case was of 1999 not 2001 in my statement husband of sudha joshi BD Joshi mentioned in his statement that the receipt was with my wife sudha joshi.DSP investgate that Sudha Joshi is innocent and Jayanti Devi got money from bank in 2001. My discussion with Lokayukta, Jayanti Devi required receipt to Sudha Joshi in 1999 not 2001and bank not issued money in 1999 also bank issued money 2001 by affidavit.I proved indestigation of DSP devendra singh Negi’s investigation was wrong in lokayukta finance judge not take any dicision all above case details police represent lokayukta all evidence now I take under RTI

 But sudha joshi proof that she is declared innocent by lokayukta and lodge deformation case referering above status. Case no. 243/2006 IPC section 499,500. Junior division court Didihat distt. Pithoragrah.

I faced many year in above case. (Date to Date but decision when?) feeled filmi dialoge and I completed every judicial prospect 2008 magistrate did not give dicision only called me. I left to go court in 2001. I used to take help of RTI in above case in Junior division court. To many judicial warrant was issued to me. I surrendered  in court in 3 feb 2012. I said to court that I need decision not relief. I went to jail.

Judicial Magistrate misused his power and put me behind bars for 40 days. I said to judicial magistrate that I need decision not relief judicial magistrate gave decision on 13 march 2012 in which I was innocent. I put myself in court. On 17 feb 2012. Judical magistrate sent message by Ad. Kundan singh bisht at jail didihat. If you confess in case, you will give less punishment. I gave reply to magistrate that use your full power. And gave me punishment if you can. Magistrate issued those date in which he was absent intently. On 13 march 2013 magistrate declared me innocent and you are relive with respect. I cried on his this case not filed on me by law or this decision should be declared on 2008. I proof that honesty is not dependent on caste, religion and area. I did great human work but judicially police harassment every times but I was not harassed to truth. police presented wrong report on favor of sudha joshi, police and in the investigation.Honorable court declared that honorable judge, Lokayukta not decleared Sudha Joshi innocent. Only Police try declared innocent under political pressure.

National commission for women order in 2000 above matter also investigation for police , SP Pitoragarh. Police presented wrong investigation,

National legal service authority. Honorable supreme tried to give exceptionally human effort to sc lady. In 2006 claim no. 847/2006 Jayanti devi vs sudha joshi was registered in junior division court didihat under legal aid. On favor of sudha joshi, peshkar Girish joshi was intended not Register the real statement of sc lady. changed statement by demoralizing SC lady and Peshkar Girish Joshi regulary harassed the SC lady and not registered true statement. They said to the SC lady that not to face big people otherwise you will be no anymore. In this event I told shoutly that how can you expect true justice where the statement recorded is not viable. the Victim lady was regularly introduced by Caste indication words. This was not registered anymore and judicial magistrate came in violent action. He became violent and I too was enforcing to go for react. Magistrate said I will see you later on. If magistrate punished me in those case, there will not wrong with me but the magistrate declare punishment to me for Six month in case No. 955/2004 State Vs Jaswant Singh. This case was registered on me for struggle on LIC corruption. I was innocent that why I did not appealed. This punishment was murder of those values of Indian constitution written by Mr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar. No innocent should be give punishment even hundreds of culprit released. I spended my tenure in Almora Jail where great man was kept who faced tough life during struggle for Independence. On 3 May 2010 R.T.I Law and Justice Ministry of Govt. of India issued an application to chief secretary, Govt. of Uttarakhand and then transfer to Justice Dept. Govt. of Uttarakhand and Dist Judge Pithoragarh and then Junior Div Court Didihat and then appeal R.T.I section 19/1 appeal CJM Dist. Court Pithoragarh informed on the basis of information given by RTI that misuse of punishment rights is violated of judicial system. Each proof is available in Blog.

I was in jail and no one with SC lady Peshkar and Judicial Magistrate harass the SC lady. He said take the case withdrawal otherwise your condition will be same as J.S Janpangi. At last SC lady withdrawl the case.

A national effort was came to an end.

GOD JUSTICE

I compromise a lot and even in future also. It is proved by struggle that honesty is not depended on cast and religion. The SC lady was honest. Upper Cast lady became Froad. After all God gave justice. Jayanti Devi still do work of maid today. Her children’s became matured. The so called great social activist, Income tax payee and owner of biggest Pharmacy shop of distt. Destroyed, Home & Pharmacy has been sold; son became addict, migrated from Didihat. It is issue in the area that Income payee upper cast lady take way the money of her maid who was SC lady. Moral less police harassed every time to SC lady. I will be same as I am and will straggle for Social Justice and right for the last benches of the society in the country. I got all the proof from Lok Ayukt Office by R.T.I and Lok Ayukt did not take any action in his favor. It was cleared to the police Enquiry that the Mr. P.S Sanga DSP rejected the SC/ST act to which court take in his knowledge. The details of all case between me and Sudha Joshi’s Family was also gives police inquiry.

I believe that the case no 243/2006 in most unexpected case of great Indian democracy. The copy of its decision is available in Blog.

Lack of 90000 court fees social justice could not be found.

4. B.P.L widow, very poor tribal lady late kausalya devi wife late Bhawan singh tolia, tehsil ward, station road, Didihat, in front of 5 mt away from highways centre of whose house, MLA started constructed Toilet, and footpath by demolishing earlier situated toiled and footpath.

In above concern, I got the information from RTI by hard struggle, who proof that violation and encroachment of sec 5,6 Road land control act 1945 UP. It was also proved by the notice issued by Asst. Eng. and Ex Eng. of PWD Didihat in 2009nagar Panchayat Didihat and there was not NOC order from District Collecter no 592-Twaise23-7 date 11.01.2010 to DM Didihat and Nagar   panchayat . Didihat show that all the work should be stoped. Till there is no legal permission for Ex. Eng. Didihat PWD.

SDM didihat not followed the order of DM under political pressure the order of DM in supporter of BJP and permit to construct of illegal construction. PWD did not issued NOC till now to the Nagar Panchayat. This is all clear by RTI form center of road both side 67.5 m land is under the land of road .

On the basis of above proves, the poor lady applied in the lokayukt uk govt. of SC/ST commission, Governor and C.M for her Social right & Justice many cased had been Solve in uk information commission in RTI 2005. DM, SDM, Tahsil dar, Navpanchayat, PWD, Didihat called to dehradun many times and I faced to all of them dehradun. Lakhs of rupees revenue was spend but the poor old lady could not get justice.

A claim no 2/2010 was registered junior division court didihat by the suggestion of high court Nainital. It was unfortunate on basis of above proof and court did issue stay on illegal construction nagar panchayat was success in illegal & unauthorized construction. It is a much unfortunate the court fix rupees 98000 as a court fees on above illegal construction to which victim could not arrange and she was tiredly dead.

BPL unemployed son again registered a case in lokayukt on the all basis of above honorable lokayukta accept the case And registered 681/2012 Kailash singh v/s nagar panchayat Didihat and  Administration Pithoragarh on the basis of lokayukt order of enquiry, tahsildar pan singh karki present wrong statement in support of nagar panchayat that all the construction by nagar panchayat at roadways station is under the holding on the ownership of land of nagar panchayat which is gotted open.PWD decleared the above land is roads is not nagarpanchayat ownership.It is proved that inquiry from tahsildar Pan Singh Karki is totally lie. I proved it then after

On 25 sep 2012 lokayukt called to DM and kailash singh tuliya at Dehradun I Represented kailash singh tuliya. If lokayukt to action with transparency then no need for lady to go to the court.Lokayukta accepted that construction is wrong but did not taken any action under political pressure.

My claim on LIC of  India and Government of India is set over Rs 5000 crore. Law expect and financial expert once analyze this mater. 4490405 LIC agent Attached the new chapter in tribal made history in LIC And made flat to lie agent LIC defeated in his own inquiry his pay renewal commission to his 4490405 agent against his own rule in 1990 he stop to pay commission on by offering serious offence. There is no way to work for agent if no commission which is mentioned in RTI information of the letter of manager LIC Pithoragarh  on ated 6/11/1992 and office enquiry on 17/04/1996 his order of divisional manager to payment of commission which mean all is bareness LIC stopped my earning by demolish my social image. I was forced to pay income tax TDS between 1990-2010 under lic RTI. Which is not give for financial problem to which income tax commissior stated wrong to LIC and this is a great fault from LIC. I open all illegal wrong activity of all LIC officer who gave me punishment. Who shy give them punish. Today max curruption is occured in LIC. If there is control over extra expenditure of LIC then there will be very less premium of poor people of country.

I got justice or not, I don’t care or my family because we do not believe in order stylish life. We believe in Human service. If all above will not give justice. I will dead and all resposibily will be of govt.of India & Uttrakhand Govt.

All proof is available in complain no 351/2004 Jaswant singh vs sudha joshi and complaint no 681/2012 it is needed to fix responstily. BJP MLA openly exorted to a tribal family which is not fair. BPL tribal lady late kaushalya devi came to downhill at the age of 72 for her social justicee. She saw first time Nainital, haldwani dehradun & Haridwar in her life. First time lifted in train, she thanks to BJP MLA to bathing in ganga other wise of all in not in his fortune.   

I gave so many relief to BPL person from RTI log on my blog http human corruption blog spot. Com me and right to information act. Near of six months I am out of home in lack of all living facilities and ispirated human right violation and trouble bed condition at uttarakhand by social conditions. If not justice above, I will no more.

Thanks you.

Your faithfully,

Jaswant Singh